Subject: install/26078: upgrade on RAID still isn't correct in certain typical cases
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.NetBSD.org>
From: Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 06/26/2004 22:03:13
>Number:         26078
>Category:       install
>Synopsis:       upgrade on RAID still isn't correct in certain typical cases
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    install-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jun 27 03:04:00 UTC 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Frederick Bruckman
>Release:        NetBSD 2.0_BETA
>Organization:
>Environment:
	
	
System: NetBSD seduction.immanent.net 2.0_BETA NetBSD 2.0_BETA (SEDUCTION) #2: Sat Jun 26 20:36:36 CDT 2004 fredb@seduction.immanent.net:/p/i386--netbsd2/obj/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/SEDUCTION i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
	
	"sysinst" offers a choice of upgrading on "raid0" -- so far so
	good, but then it chokes, saying "raid2p" fails to fsck. Escaping
	to the shell shows that only raid0 was configured, which would be
	fine, except for that "sysinst" evidently wants to "fsck" everything
	in "/etc/fstab".
>How-To-Repeat:
	
	I think it will fail whenever you have more than one raid device.
	It doesn't even matter if you choose to upgrade on one of the raid
	devices, or not.
>Fix:
	
	I seem to remember that it works to comment out unnecessary
	partitions from "/etc/fstab", although that fact slipped my mind
	when I was testing "sysinst" this afternoon. It would be reasonable
	to configure more raid partitions automatically. The INSTALL kernel
	already has "pseudo-device raid 8". Is it that some of the default
	raid devices are missing from "/dev"?


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
 	
 	
 	Complete release built from source updated this afternoon,
 	Sat Jun 26 17:03:11 UTC 2004