enami tsugutomo wrote:

> > It appears that seminfo.semume isn't changable (unless you mean changing
> > it with say gdb --write).  I think the original patch in the PR has the
> > right effect otherwise.  That said, it looks like changing SEMU to use
> > seminfo.semume instead of SEMUME would be a good idea.
> 
> Simply sysv_sem.c wasn't recompiled since it doesn't include
> opt_sysvparam.h, was it?

I thought about that too.  I think technically param.c is meant to have
the changable parameters, and sysv_sem.c should just use what is in
seminfo and not look at predefined constants.

This gets back to the "do we want a somehow modified seminfo" to work
(with "gdb --write" or a newly introduced system call or possibly a
superuser-only semctl command)?

Simon.
--
Simon Burge                            <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Support and Service:         http://www.wasabisystems.com/