>Number:         13818
>Category:       admin
>Synopsis:       /etc/mtree/special contains a rule for usr/pkgsrc
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    netbsd-admin
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Aug 29 06:15:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Ken Wellsch
>Release:        up to -current
>Organization:
>Environment:
all ports
System: NetBSD arundel.fortyfour.org 1.5X NetBSD 1.5X (ARUNDEL) #0: Mon Aug 27 14:07:17 EDT 2001 kwellsch@arundel.fortyfour.org:/fsys/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/ARUNDEL i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:

I am reminded every night that

  Checking special files and directories.
  usr/pkgsrc:
          type (dir, link)

because I link all of what I once sup'ed and now cvs, onto another disk.

Thus, /usr/doc, /usr/pkgsrc, /usr/src and /usr/xsrc fall into
the same category for me.  Since /usr/doc is unlikely to change
size dramatically, it is less of a worry I admit.

So why do we include a rule

  pkgsrc          type=dir mode=0755 uname=root gname=wheel ignore optional
  ..      #usr/pkgsrc

yet not for usr/doc, usr/src or usr/xsrc ?

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

I would request that we drop the rule for pkgsrc, or else I
guess to be consistent add rules for the other three...
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: