>Number:         12536
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       find defaults to -printing -pruned off -or expressions
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    bin-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Apr 03 09:48:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     John Hawkinson
>Release:        NetBSD 1.5
>Organization:
MIT
>Environment:
	
System: NetBSD zorkmid.mit.edu 1.5T NetBSD 1.5T (ZORKMID-$Revision: 1.8 $) #91: Mon Apr 2 16:17:26 EDT 2001 jhawk@zorkmid.mit.edu:/usr/local/netbsd-current/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/ZORKMID i386


>Description:
	When the find command has two operands of an -or operator,
if no -print is specified, it defaults to applying -print to both operands,
not merely to the second operand.

	This is particularly confusing in light of -prune.

	Adding a "-print" to the end of the expression fixes this.
>How-To-Repeat:
	For instance, this has the unexpected result of printing
"./disklabels" as well as pruning it:

zorkmid% find . -name disklabels -prune -o -type d  | head
.
./disklabels
./kerberosIV
./mtree
./namedb
./postfix
./skel
./sliphome
./uucp
./RCS

	To suppress printing of "./disklabels", one must explicitly
specify print for the second operand of the -or:

zorkmid% find . -name disklabels -prune -o -type d -print | head
.
./kerberosIV
./mtree
./namedb
./postfix
./skel
./sliphome
./uucp
./RCS
./ppp


This seems hokey. The Solaris find doesn't have this problem,
but gnu find appears to.
>Fix:
	
	WORKAROUND: Append -print.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: