Subject: Re: port-arm32/12120: arm32 wdc drivers should use wdc_print_modes for a bit more info
To: None <chris@paradox.demon.co.uk>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 02/04/2001 14:07:59
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 01:58:42PM +0000, chris@paradox.demon.co.uk wrote:
> 
> >Number:         12120
> >Category:       port-arm32
> >Synopsis:       arm32 wdc drivers should use wdc_print_modes for a bit more info
> >Confidential:   no
> >Severity:       non-critical
> >Priority:       low
> >Responsible:    port-arm32-maintainer
> >State:          open
> >Class:          change-request
> >Submitter-Id:   net
> >Arrival-Date:   Sat Feb 03 06:00:00 PST 2001
> >Closed-Date:
> >Last-Modified:
> >Originator:     
> >Release:        02-02-2001
> >Organization:
> >Environment:
> System: NetBSD pinky.paradox.demon.co.uk 1.5R NetBSD 1.5R (PINKY2) #10: Fri Feb 2 23:47:51 GMT 2001 chris@pinky.paradox.demon.co.uk:/usr/src/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/PINKY2 i386
> Architecture: i386
> Machine: i386
> >Description:
> 	When booting the arm32 kernels do not output what mode the wdc device is running the channels/devices in.  We should use the newish wdc_print_modes call
> >How-To-Repeat:
> 	Boot a kernel/check dmesg and note the lack of info on what mode wdc is running in.

I think this change is wrong, because none of these front-end support
WDC_CAPABILITY_MODE flag; so the infos printed by wdc_print_modes() will
not be accurate.

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--