Subject: kern/10301: NETATALK should have better diagnostics than "ddp_route: oops"
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: Erik E. Fair <fair@digital.clock.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 06/06/2000 12:44:12
>Number: 10301
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: NETATALK should have better diagnostics than "ddp_route: oops"
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: kern-bug-people
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Jun 06 12:45:00 PDT 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Erik E. Fair
>Release: 1.4.2
>Organization:
International Organization of Internet Clock Watchers
>Environment:
System: NetBSD digital.clock.org 1.4.2A NetBSD 1.4.2A (DIGITAL) #2: Tue May 23 17:26:00 PDT 2000 root@digital.clock.org:/usr/obj/sys/arch/alpha/compile/DIGITAL alpha
>Description:
The diagnostic "ddp_route: oops" is hardly descriptive enough.
What does this mean? I am reminded of Opus and Oliver Wendell
Jones the Hacker from Bloom County...
>How-To-Repeat:
compile a kernel with options NETATALK
route some AppleTalk on your network.
restart another AppleTalk router. Observe strange diagnostic.
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: