Subject: kern/10301: NETATALK should have better diagnostics than "ddp_route: oops"
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: Erik E. Fair <fair@digital.clock.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 06/06/2000 12:44:12
>Number:         10301
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       NETATALK should have better diagnostics than "ddp_route: oops"
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    kern-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jun 06 12:45:00 PDT 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Erik E. Fair
>Release:        1.4.2
>Organization:
International Organization of Internet Clock Watchers
>Environment:
	
System: NetBSD digital.clock.org 1.4.2A NetBSD 1.4.2A (DIGITAL) #2: Tue May 23 17:26:00 PDT 2000 root@digital.clock.org:/usr/obj/sys/arch/alpha/compile/DIGITAL alpha


>Description:
	The diagnostic "ddp_route: oops" is hardly descriptive enough.
	What does this mean? I am reminded of Opus and Oliver Wendell
	Jones the Hacker from Bloom County...
>How-To-Repeat:
	compile a kernel with options NETATALK
	route some AppleTalk on your network.
	restart another AppleTalk router. Observe strange diagnostic.
>Fix:
	
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: