Dave Sainty writes:
> And I think Chris is right, the documentation on all modes on symlinks
> is sparce.  I think it's information that should be covered in the
> documentation.  It's just the right thing to do, right?  (Doing this
> follows the general trend of other functions that the documentation
> performs :) ).

Okay. Someone has to write it. Based on what you've heard so far, do
you suppose you could submit patches to symlink(7)? If they are
reasonable, I promise to commit them.

Perry