On Mar 4, Frank van der Linden wrote
> I fixed it by doing what you said for the time being; not sure how that
> 0 crept in there, it should have been LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_RETRY all along.
> 
> You can just get rid of all the ISLOCKED stuff by using LK_CANRECURSE,
> but I can't test this right now, so I didn't do that yet (maybe you
> can test it?).

I'll try this. I make an heavy use of vnd for the endian-independant ffs
developement.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--