> I understand the point.  I wouldn't do this for any other executables, but 
> IMHO ld.so is a special case (the only must be statically linked binary).
> I don't have a single statically linked binary on my system.

In a phrase: "BRAVE MAN!"

i'd at least keep init, sh, fsck, and mount statically linked.  but
then i guess that's 'conservative.'


chris

------------------------------------------------------------------------------