> From owner-netbsd-bugs@sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu Thu Jan 13 13:33 CST 1994
> From: mycroft@gnu.ai.mit.edu
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 94 12:51:16 est
> To: netbsd-bugs@sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu,
>         owner-netbsd-bugs@sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re:  ldconfig looks in /usr/X386/lib
> 
> 
> /usr/X11/lib is even more non-standard!  The proper place for X libs is
> in /usr/lib.
> 
> 

I would have to say I have NEVER seen libs in a dir called /usr/X11/lib.
I HAVE seen them in /usr/lib/X11, but I have seen them more often in 
/usr/lib.

However, why is it a problem to have ldconfig look in all these places?
Would it not be more robust to catch the weird configurations?  I can't
imagine that anyone would worry about the run time of an ldconfig.

j

------------------------------------------------------------------------------