Subject: Re: 4-Clause license question
To: Tom Nakamura <email@example.com>
From: Mike M. Volokhov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/16/2005 10:04:09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:34:40 -0700
"Tom Nakamura" <email@example.com> wrote:
> I just found out that NetBSD uses the old BSD license with the so-called
> advertisement clause. Quick question: if the netbsd OS is shipped
> installed on an embedded device, does that constitute binary
> distribution, and thus make it necessary to include a notice signifying
> the NetBSD foundation code? (after all, the only difference between CD
> distribution and selling such a device is that the device would store
> the binary on a flash disk or something). And does it require the other
> 75 advertisement sentences included with NetBSD be reproduced as well?
> Tom N
AFAIK it's allowed to use "detached" licence. In this case, you must
include the copyright notices (acc. condition #3) and point to location
of the licence for every binary you use (to be on the safe side).
``2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.''
Please note the ``in the documentation and/or other materials provided
with the distribution'' phrase.
P.S. Very interesting, that binary NetBSD distribution seems doesn't
explicitly contain a licence (correct me please if I'm wrong). Should
we create a /LICENCE file or provide it as licence(7) to fix this?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----