On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Mike Cheponis wrote:

>           On the other hand, no, Linux does not have that _stupid_ notion of
>           having totally separate kernel development for different issues.  If
>           you want a secure BSD, you get Open BSD; if you want a usable BSD, you
>           get FreeBSD; and if you want BSD on other architectures, you get
>           NetBSD.  That is just idiotic, to have different teams worry about
>           different things.

Please send a letter to the editor of the magazine politely explaining why
this is wrong.

Or feel free to send me the contact information from magazine and I will
do it.

 Jeremy C. Reed

 	  	 	 BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links
	  	 	 http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/