--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:46:45PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> OK, can you run benchmarks on these sites?
> The FeFe benchmarks are a bit dates, but may be a possible starting point.
> Let us know when you have some numbers/pictures!

btw. fefe: I'm coming from the Linux-world and I've finally chosen
NetBSD because of those words:
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/#netbsd2
But it wasn't the performance issue. You can read there, that NetBSD
must have an excellent crew, who know how to do the job!

I followed FreeBSD- and NetBSD-mailinglists and I must say that
FreeBSD people often blamed each other. Of course, Matt Dillon left
the project to create Dragonfly. NetBSD profits from that fact.
According to Dillon's words, FreeBSD-current (Now stable) has a
very bad design. (Donnow...)

If you want to get some of their users, don't forget to mention, that
there wasn't a NetBSD-1.7, which didn't get STABLE, because it crashed=20
to often. ;)

Aiko

PS.: FreeBSD has at least one big advantage: They've got that cool
daemon. ;)
--=20
Aiko Barz
aiko@chroot.de

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFByAZI3EZTlJbgeiYRAqfhAKCUL5TLeQcaUWyA5Hcqmk0JkoTqlwCeP2Ui
htdOk7YIfDusVQhbdUu9va8=
=QbYC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--