Subject: Re: NetBSD momentum
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Aiko Barz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/21/2004 12:17:28
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:46:45PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> OK, can you run benchmarks on these sites?
> The FeFe benchmarks are a bit dates, but may be a possible starting point.
> Let us know when you have some numbers/pictures!
btw. fefe: I'm coming from the Linux-world and I've finally chosen
NetBSD because of those words:
But it wasn't the performance issue. You can read there, that NetBSD
must have an excellent crew, who know how to do the job!
I followed FreeBSD- and NetBSD-mailinglists and I must say that
FreeBSD people often blamed each other. Of course, Matt Dillon left
the project to create Dragonfly. NetBSD profits from that fact.
According to Dillon's words, FreeBSD-current (Now stable) has a
very bad design. (Donnow...)
If you want to get some of their users, don't forget to mention, that
there wasn't a NetBSD-1.7, which didn't get STABLE, because it crashed=20
to often. ;)
PS.: FreeBSD has at least one big advantage: They've got that cool
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----