Andy Ruhl wrote:

>I actually have quite a few comments here, but I don't have time right
>now to respond.
>
>What I can say is that FreeBSD can still be the right tool for the
>job, and there are things in it that I wish NetBSD did better.
>Consequently, this is why I still haven't converted my main server
>over to NetBSD, even though I use NetBSD for most everything else.
>
>I think it will be a natural process for people to start looking
>elsewhere if they really believe the stuff in this article are true
>roadblocks to them. And I think it will also be natural to start
>looking at NetBSD if these people are true BSD followers, because
>Linux and commercial unix don't fit the same niche that BSD people
>often want.
>
>There has been some good NetBSD press recently in some benchmarks, and
>the 2.0 release seems to be good. No need to rub it in.
>
>Andy
>
>  
>
I'd like to see your comments when you have the time. Can you point 
these benchmarks?

Thanks in advance,

Bruno Henriques