Subject: Re: NetBSD review by Paul Webb
To: Ben Collver <collver@peak.org>
From: Andy Ruhl <acruhl@gmail.com>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 11/01/2004 16:11:41
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:06:10 -0800, Ben Collver <collver@peak.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:56:20PM -0700, Andy Ruhl wrote:
> > Opinions that are not true are not, in fact, opinions. They are just
> > incorrect statements. Opinions should be preferences that are based on
> > factual information.
> 
> Consulting the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, an opinion may be an opinion
> without being factual or even preferential.
> 
> Are your statements correct?

Hmm. Nice one. I hadn't actually red the definition of opinion in a
long time. What I said above was my operating belief of an incorrect
statement vs. an opinion. I stand by it, even if it's not word for
word correct based on the definition of the word. What I said can be
construed as incorrect though, I agree.

However, I'm guessing that the website in question probably wants to
publish opinions that are based on fact if they have any hope of being
a respectable source of information.

Seems like I should stay away from that website at all costs :) 

Andy