In article <20031021221603.GA16254@mail>, David Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:01:42PM +0000, Alan Post wrote:
>> 
>> Yeah, but don't get too excited:  FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Linux 2.6
>> were all unstable versions.  I'll leave the Linux 2.4 flames for
>> other people.  :)
> 
> You failed to note that he updated to FreeBSD-current because
> FreeBSD stable crashed on him

Both on the 5.X tree, which is confusingly labelled and entirely
unstable.

> OpenBSD current because the OpenBSD release had significant
> performance issues.

I thought we were discussing stability?  :)