Subject: Sysinst is the best!
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ram Chandar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/28/2002 18:12:40
I was under the impression that sysinst is very
primitive and thought that Open and FreeBSD have
I didn't notice it when NetBSD/i386 1.6 installed
fine on the other end of the my second, ATA
(40G) disk unceremoniously and the system
booted fine, though I remember that sysinst was
very concerned about the bootability of my
setup and asked a lot of questions about it.
FreeBSD 4.7 /stand/sysinstall refuses to even
put a disklabel on the disk.
OpenBSD installs fine, (It acts like it knows
everything about the boot situation), but
refuses to boot.