On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:41:36PM -0500, Richard Rauch wrote:
> it should be free from the kind of offence (or ``impropriety'' as one
> would have it) that the old image has been associated with.

Unfortunately I do not have anything constructive to add.  However, I am
sure someone will find a way to get all upset and "offended" about just
about anything one could dream up.