On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:54:51AM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote:
> In message <20020314023311.GA24735@widomaker.com>, Charles Shannon Hendrix writ
> es:
> >Comparing it to other symbols not remotely related isn't worth pursuing.
> 
> The problem isn't that they're not *remotely* related.  It's that they're
> *remotely* related, and it's sufficiently remote as to be non-useful.

Actually, that's what was on my mind too, but the mind and the fingers
don't always agree on the output.

Mostly, I just find it interesting when there is this much flammage over
a simple issue, especially when the suggested alternatives are even more
widely offensive (or whatever).

Design a logo, if everyone likes it, I think it's a done deal.

Of course, I will likely keep using the old one for some things, because
I like it.  

It really is funny that we are debating the arrangement of mini-Satans,
when so many won't likely care about the arrangement itself... :)


-- 
UNIX/Perl/C/Pizza__________________________________shannon@widomaker.com