Subject: Re: Gartner perspective on BSD
To: Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@mogua.com>
From: Mike Cheponis <mac@Wireless.Com>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/13/2002 10:39:20
Whoever does it must do it very politely and diplomatically.   -Mike

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Bang Jun-Young wrote:

> Subject: Re: Gartner perspective on BSD
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:03:50AM -0500, Scott Bartram wrote:
> >
> > http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2846265,00.html
>
> "... the most popular of which are OpenBSD, and BSD/OS."
>
> "Downloaded copies of FreeBSD and OpenBSD are free of charge
> under Berkeley license terms; NetBSD is free of charge with
> Berkeley license terms mostly applying but with some source
> code covered by GPL license terms."
>
> "The NetBSD source tree contains some software that is not
> covered by Berkeley license terms. Because NetBSD does not
> have time to rewrite it all, ..."
>
> "OpenBSD diverged from NetBSD to address security."
>
> Who will tell her the fact?
>
> Jun-Young