Subject: Re: emul compat pages?
To: David Maxwell <email@example.com>
From: Claus Andersen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/04/2000 17:26:41
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, David Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:45:10PM +0200, Claus Andersen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, David Maxwell wrote:
> > Wouldn't a sparse table be better to give an overview than a sparse
> > list?
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean there.
I think the table (http://www.ntwork.dk/compat.html) will be smaller and
easier to read than what you have at
http://bester.worldmap.net/david/compat.html#ports - I find the
"long" listing rather annoying but have to admit it is a pure question of
> So forget my maintainence comment, the remaining question is the
> sparseness one.
> As I see it, putting all the ports in a table means you have to look at
> things you don't care about, and puts more space between the things you
> are looking for.
I think that you have to look at even more you don't care about at
So I believe we have a Mexican stand-off... Wait! You have commit access -
I do not - You win! :-)
P.S. Further comments might better be directed to email@example.com as I
think we are starting to wear most advocacy people down :-)