Subject: Re: seti & rc5-64
To: None <Thiesi@I.am>
From: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/29/2000 16:09:22
Mirko Thiesen <thiesi@ReLink.NetWork23.BSDOnLine.ORG>  wrote:
 > Herb Peyerl wrote:
 > > 
 > > Jim McKim <mckim@bandersnatch.lerc.nasa.gov>  wrote:
 > >  > I'm not the diplomat to present this to the SETI@home group, but
 > >  > perhaps it should also be brought to their attention that some number
 > >  > of *BSD advocates are also in the position of deciding if SETI@home
 > >  > related traffic should be allowed through firewalls...
 > > 
 > > That would be moderately childish.
 > 
 > Although you're right, Herb, I think it's probably an idea that might
 > work out anyway. At least we could keep it in mind as some kind of last
 > measure we can take.

It might work out, but then again, it might tar us with icky feathers
that we won't be able to wash off for a buncha years..