Subject: Re: seti & rc5-64
To: None <netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Jim McKim <mckim@bandersnatch.lerc.nasa.gov>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/29/2000 11:17:31
--Multipart_Tue_Feb_29_11:17:31_2000-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.ORG> writes:

> 	I would prefer to have my machines running seti rather than rc5,
> 	but given that the seti project has stopped supporting NetBSD
> 	binaries I intend to switch all my spare CPU cycles (including
> 	non NetBSD ones) across onto rc5.
> 
> 	Maybe others would like to do the same?
> 
> 	I'll update the NetBSD htdocs page to mention this (with a rider
> 	that if anyone can persuade seti to make NetBSD binaries, at least
> 	some of us would be happy to switch back :)
> 
> 		David/absolute

I'm not the diplomat to present this to the SETI@home group, but
perhaps it should also be brought to their attention that some number
of *BSD advocates are also in the position of deciding if SETI@home
related traffic should be allowed through firewalls...


--Multipart_Tue_Feb_29_11:17:31_2000-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Jim McKim
Network Security Team
NASA Glenn Research Center


--Multipart_Tue_Feb_29_11:17:31_2000-1--