Thilo Manske wrote:

> Scanners:
> SANE already maintains a big list of what they support and what not.
> I guess nowadays everybody uses sane to scan, so does it make sense
> to enter scanners here?

  I think it still makes sense to add scanners here, that have _actually
been used_ by NetBSD users.  Otherwise, we'd be back to square one,
because we already have a list of hardware that is/should be supported.

  Cheers
      ,
   Rene