Subject: Re: Which OS would YOU choose?
To: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 12/07/1999 22:24:00
On 7 Dec 1999, Michael Graff wrote:
> Should NetBSD be used?
>
> Should FreeBSD be used?
>
> Should OpenBSD be used?
>
> Should Linux be used?
Issues:
- ARM; this counts out FreeBSD
- embedded sounds like a system with small memory. the lower limit
that the various OSs support here may have an impact, depending on the
system you want to port to.
- Similarly, device drivers.
- For "which OS", you need to know what OS functionality you exactly
need. When you choose some Linux distrib, you usually need to start
hacking a lot of things to fit your needs, unless you find a distrib
that fits you. BSD may offer advantages here. And given that of the
above choice NetBSD is probably the only one that comes with support
for i386 and arm in one source tree as already shipped, that'd may
help. Else you'll spend more time maintaining your own OS than you can
concentrate on your application(s).
- Hubert
--
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra