Subject: Re: [Frank da Cruz : Re: Kermit and
To: Frank da Cruz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greywolf <email@example.com>
Date: 11/26/1999 22:10:04
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Frank da Cruz wrote:
# fdc> Well, there's a trademarked term, but... ;-)
# No, it's not trademarked -- the trademark application was denied. If it was
# trademarked, then I'd feel more confident about it, since the definition would
# be nailed down. That was the original intention of the authors -- the prevent
# the term Open Source from being hijacked. What prevents it now?
The term "Open Source" is denied a trademark, but "Windows" is granted
one? Cheeses Keerist, now I've seen everything.
# - Frank
NetBSD: Where would you have rather been today, tomorrow?