Has this already been noted, or is it news to folks? I really, really like
what they said about NetBSD's contributions to Darwin.

http://www.publicsource.apple.com/projects/darwin/contributors.html

It seems odd that they'd use FreeBSD as a model for kernel development
when they're not on an Intel platform and when they're using Mach. Can
someone comment on this? Have the FreeBSD folks been careful to preserve
machine independence despite their mostly single-platform target?

-- 
                           /\
     Mason Loring Bliss   /()\   mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us
 awake ? sleep : dream;  /    \  http://acheron.ne.mediaone.net