Subject: [kolstad@ace.DELOS.COM: Re: Inaccuracy in Rik Farrow's "musings" column in April's ;login]
To: None <netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org>
From: David Maxwell <david@fundy.ca>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 04/15/1999 04:07:09
Reply regarding the Linux portability comments...
----- Forwarded message from Rob Kolstad <kolstad@ace.DELOS.COM> -----
>From ace.DELOS.COM!kolstad Tue Apr 13 18:16:48 1999
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:01:23 -0600 (MDT)
From: Rob Kolstad <kolstad@ace.DELOS.COM>
To: david@fundy.ca
Subject: Re: Inaccuracy in Rik Farrow's "musings" column in April's ;login
I have seen Rik's next column. He apologizes profusely.
RK
From david@fundy.ca Thu Apr 1 11:17:56 1999
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 14:17:44 -0400
From: David Maxwell <david@fundy.ca>
To: kolstad@usenix.org, jel@usenix.org
Subject: Inaccuracy in Rik Farrow's "musings" column in April's ;login
X-Status:
Someone brought the following statement to my attention in the
referenced article:
"While Linux already runs on more different processors than any
other operating system, ..."
NetBSD, another Open Source Operating System, which has a
background in the BSD version of Unix is much more widely
ported, and stable on many more platforms than Linux.
It would be nice to see some sort of correction to the
statement made in the article. NetBSD has always been focused
on portability and machine independant quality code, while
Linux has had an Intel x86 focus for a long time and is
just beginning to become more machine independant, as
vendors jump on the marketability of being Linux-friendly
at the moment.
A quick scan of the NetBSD mailing lists will show you
many comments along the lines of "I've been trying to
install Linux for Alpha for a while, and had problems...
then I tried NetBSD, and it _just worked_. Thanks"
See 'Supported Hardware' on www.netbsd.org, but the
list includes these stable platforms:
Architectures with formal releases
For these architectures, binary and source distributions of the latest formal release are available.
Port Processor Machines
alpha alpha Digital Alpha (64bit)
amiga m68k Commodore Amiga, DraCo
arm32 arm32 Acorn RiscPC/A7000, CATS, Digital Shark, EBSA-285, VLSI RC7500
atari m68k Atari TT030, Falcon, Hades
hp300 m68k Hewlett-Packard 9000/300
i386 i386 i386 family IBM PCs and clones
mac68k m68k Apple Macintosh
mvme68k m68k Motorola MVME boards
pc532 ns32k The PC532
pmax mips Digital MIPS-based DECstations and DECsystems
sparc sparc Sun SPARC
sun3 m68k Sun 3
sun3x m68k Sun 3X (merged with sun3 in -current)
vax vax Digital VAX
x68k m68k Sharp X680x0
With these in development (running, but not recommended for
production environments):
Port Processor Machines
pica mips Acer Pica
bebox powerpc BeBox
ofppc powerpc PowerPC systems with OpenFirmware
newsmips mips Sony NEWS 3400
macppc powerpc Apple Power Macintosh
next68k m68k NeXT-68k
sparc64r sparcr Sun Ultrasparc (64bit)
--
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net --> Mastery of UNIX, like
mastery of language, offers real freedom. The price of freedom is always dear,
but there's no substitute. Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live
in a bitmapped, pop-up-happy dungeon like NT. - Thomas Scoville
----- End forwarded message -----
--
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net --> Mastery of UNIX, like
mastery of language, offers real freedom. The price of freedom is always dear,
but there's no substitute. Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live
in a bitmapped, pop-up-happy dungeon like NT. - Thomas Scoville