by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 1999 23:09:07 -0000
	by rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA22100;
	Tue, 16 Mar 1999 00:08:59 +0100 (MET)
	by rfhs8036.fh-regensburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA28138;
	Tue, 16 Mar 1999 00:08:56 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 00:08:56 +0100 (MET)
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
Reply-To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: "Scott R. Burns" <Scott.Burns@Netcontech.Com>
cc: "'netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org'" <netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG>,
        "'port-arm32@netbsd.org'" <port-arm32@NetBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Intel Web Pages
In-Reply-To: <01BE6EE3.1D62FA50@NCTI75>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.00.9903160008080.19386-100000@rfhs8036.fh-regensburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Scott R. Burns wrote:
> I see that the NetBSD OS is posted on the Intel Web Site under the Strong Arm pages. I also see quite a bit of traffic on the lists about people running this release. Under the Development Toolks and OS/s pages on the Intel site it still shows as Porting, where as some operating systems and tools show as "Beta - Available" or "Available". Would one of those not be more appropriate ?

Tell them it's fully up and running. :-)

I'm sitting at Shark (NC with StrongARM) right now, running X and PPP
connection to the world. :)


 - Hubert

-- 
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>