Subject: Intel Web Pages
To: 'netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org' <netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org>
From: Scott R. Burns <Scott.Burns@Netcontech.Com>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 03/15/1999 12:55:32
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 1999 17:59:12 -0000
	by netcontech.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA23436;
	Mon, 15 Mar 1999 17:35:40 GMT
	id <01BE6EE3.1D62FA50@NCTI75>; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:55:34 -0500
Message-ID: <01BE6EE3.1D62FA50@NCTI75>
From: "Scott R. Burns" <Scott.Burns@Netcontech.Com>
To: "'netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org'" <netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org>,
        "'port-arm32@netbsd.org'" <port-arm32@netbsd.org>
Subject: Intel Web Pages
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:55:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I see that the NetBSD OS is posted on the Intel Web Site under the =
Strong Arm pages. I also see quite a bit of traffic on the lists about =
people running this release. Under the Development Toolks and OS/s pages =
on the Intel site it still shows as Porting, where as some operating =
systems and tools show as "Beta - Available" or "Available". Would one =
of those not be more appropriate ?

Scott...