Subject: Re: Writing a technical article about NetBSD
To: Dante Profeta <dante@mclink.it>
From: Anders Dinsen <dinsen@danbbs.dk>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 10/08/1998 16:15:45
  by homeworld.cygnus.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 1998 15:20:38 -0000
From: dinsen@danbbs.dk (Anders Dinsen)
To: Dante Profeta <dante@mclink.it>
Cc: netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Writing a technical article about NetBSD
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 16:15:45 GMT
Reply-To: dinsen@danbbs.dk
Message-ID: <361bc0eb.1838791@mail.danbbs.dk>
References: <361b6504.526e.0@mail.danbbs.dk> <361B7B3B.653B3340@mclink.it>
In-Reply-To: <361B7B3B.653B3340@mclink.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 07 Oct 1998 16:31:23 +0200, you wrote:
>Anders Dinsen wrote:
>> In my opinion [...]
>
>Umh... yes these are interesting topics for many people, but I'm writing
>an in depth technical article, so I'm going to write about kernel
>solutions... for example:
>- Major differences between 4.4BSD and NetBSD kernel
>- Portability (what kind of technical solutions this imply)
>- bus_dma implementation (...)
>- UVM (why it is better than Mach VM)
>- Peripheral autoconfiguration (how does it works)
>
>and so on...

Ah, well I'd like to have a copy of that article then.

Anders