Re: SSHv2 MIB?

[Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat%Sun.COM@localhost>]

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

> Existing implementations are typically managed through configuration
> files or the equivalent.

Not only that but what is configurable and what that means is very
variable between implementations.

IMO having a common config interface to the SSH protocol server doesn't
make any sense.  In vendors wish to add that support then it would be
specific to what they allow in configuration.

I just can't see what you would want to configure in a standard way that
would make writting a standard MIB worth while.

--
Darren J Moffat