Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld%east.sun.com@localhost>]

> I'd prefer to see AES as REQUIRED and 3DES put down to RECOMMENDED. Having
> two REQUIRED ciphers adds to the size of implementations, and could be an
> issue in some small environments.

I've seen sufficient opposition to demoting 3DES that the only thing
on the table right now is whether we should promote AES.

Anyone have data on:

- what proportion of the code size of a "minimized" implementation is
the actual algorithm code?  i.e., are we talking 1% or 10% bloat here?

- how widespread is AES support today?

					- Bill