Re: core draft nits

[Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz%cmu.edu@localhost>]

On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:

> Wrong fix.  If we ended up with more than one algorithm, your proposed
> fix might not support all algorithms concurrently due to lack of key
> storage space in an implementation.
>
> 	Implementations MUST be capable of having at least one key for each
> 	REQUIRED public key algorithm at any given time and MUST have some
> 	method for the user/operator to configure that key.

Yes, your text definitely works better.