Re: driver(9)

[Valery Ushakov <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 11:09:47 +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:

> yet the next paragraph still mentions CFATTACH_DECL and declares sc_dev.
> 
> Apply the following (which leaves an odd struct foo_softc declaration)?
> 
> --- a/share/man/man9/driver.9
> +++ b/share/man/man9/driver.9
[...]
> @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ structure for driver
>  is defined with:
>  .Bd -literal
>  struct foo_softc {
> -       device_t sc_dev;                /* generic device info */
>         /* device-specific state */
>  };
>  .Ed

You are a bit confused here.  device_t is a _pointer_ to the struct
device, not inline struct device (as it used to be).  You can check
cvs history for commits that (among other things) do:

-	struct device foo_dev;
+	device_t foo_dev;

usually with something like "split softc and device_t" in the log
message.

-uwe