Re: It appears the terminal bell doesn't work with our definition of wsvt25?, is that right?

[Valery Ushakov <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost>]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:25:56 -0800, Brian Buhrow wrote:

> <Non-working bell trace>
>        "\^["
>        "["
>        "?"
>        "5"
>        "h"
[...]
>        "\^["
>        "["
>        "?"
>        "5"
>        "l"

This is "flash" from vt220 (<CSI><?>...<h>, in general, turns
something on, and ...<l> - turns it off; <5> is inverse screen).

Are you sure you turned flash off in vi settings?  On vt100 there's no
flash capability, so flash() function falls back to beeping.

-uwe