Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

In article <>,
Robert Elz  <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost> wrote:
>I'll keep looking, and see if there is a reasonable path forward, which
>allows rump's bizarre etfs to function as needed, without completely
>breaking normal unix pathname resolution semantics.

Perhaps add a flag to the mount command to not do the realpath check?


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index