Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 5 days old?

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:57 PM Greg A. Woods <> wrote:
> At Thu, 21 May 2020 15:11:41 -0400, Andrew Cagney <> wrote:
> Subject: Re: 5 days old?
> >
> > The details are all found here:
> >
> That just says what might happen (and what could/should happen at the
> same time), not why (nor how the decision was arrived at).
> > > I've never found anything there explaining the actual rationale for Hg.
> --

Joerg is the one doing all of the work and he wants to land on hg.

Every other "justification" or benchmark or whatever is pretty much a
lie.  Especially now, five years later, when git has gotten better and
better at big repos.


p.s. this whole thing reached a head (Core statement on version
control systems) in Jan 2015

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index