Re: ongoing git vs hg (was: github.com/NetBSD/src 5 days old?)

[Marc Balmer <mhbalmer%gmail.com@localhost>]

I would be very happy if a decision would be taken in a timely manner. I prefer git over mercurial, but any of them is better than cvs.



> Am 14.05.2020 um 17:27 schrieb Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>:
> 
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:16:31PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>> I.e. the final repo DAG should contain all submitted commits, and all
>> that history should be visible to those who look for it (just as is the
>> case with merges from github "pull requests").
> 
> This is the case in our setup. In the "draft" phase you can revert,
> rewrite, collapse and change a few things, but in the end you have
> a line of changesets that on final push are made visible on the tip
> of the trunk (still as individual changes).
> 
> Martin