Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: build failure in libz
Hi,
It seems that files in the following directories are rolled back to
rev 1.x after removing & re-adding to phil-wifi branch:
src/common/dist/zlib
src/crypto/external/bsd/heimdal
src/crypto/dist/ipsec-tools
For example for src/common/dist/zlib/inflate.h, 1.1 is checked out
whereas 1.1.1.2 should be.
I don't understand why commits to phil-wifi affected to -HEAD...
Thanks,
rin
On 2020/04/22 7:41, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I'm running a userland from 2020-04-12/amd64 when NetBSD built fine for me.
When I try building NetBSD-current now, it fails in libz with:
# compile libz/infback.o
gcc -O2 -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -Wsystem-headers -Wno-traditional -Wa,--fatal-warnings -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Werror -fPIE -fstack-protector -Wstack-protector --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -I/usr/src/common/dist/zlib -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c -
Wno-error=implicit-fallthrough /usr/src/common/dist/zlib/infback.c -o infback.o
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/infback.c: In function ‘inflateBackInit_’:
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/infback.c:69:12: error: ‘struct inflate_state’ has no member named ‘wnext’; did you mean ‘next’?
state->wnext = 0;
^~~~~
next
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/infback.c: In function ‘inflateBack’:
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/infback.c:481:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
state->mode = LEN;
~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/infback.c:483:9: note: here
case LEN:
^~~~
*** Error code 1
And
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/inflate.c: In function 'inflateMark':
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/inflate.c:1559:47: error: 'struct inflate_state' has no member named 'back'
return (long)(((unsigned long)((long)state->back)) << 16) +
^~
/usr/src/common/dist/zlib/inflate.c:1561:44: error: 'struct inflate_state' has no member named 'was'; did you mean 'last'?
(state->mode == MATCH ? state->was - state->length : 0));
^~~
last
I don't see a mail about this from the build bots, and I don't see any
relevant changes between April 12 and today (about an hour ago) that'd
explain it.
Any ideas?
Thomas
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index