Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: diagnostic assertion curcpu()->ci_biglock_count == 0 failed

To: Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: diagnostic assertion curcpu()->ci_biglock_count == 0 failed
From: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 19:26:34 +0000

Can someone please offer a another set of eyes on this commit?
https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/065ad9b5c35f8798d18fe75356b2c22ee42a4896

Removing KERNEL_UNLOCK_ALLs feels wild. But I don't understand the code
well enough to know whether it's right.

References:
- diagnostic assertion curcpu()->ci_biglock_count == 0 failed
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: diagnostic assertion curcpu()->ci_biglock_count == 0 failed
  - From: Andrew Doran

Prev by Date: Re: Failures in x86 pmap
Next by Date: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success
Previous by Thread: Re: diagnostic assertion curcpu()->ci_biglock_count == 0 failed
Next by Thread: Re: diagnostic assertion curcpu()->ci_biglock_count == 0 failed
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index