Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

[Andreas Gustafsson <gson%gson.org@localhost>]

Andrew Doran wrote:
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v1_16384
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v2_32768
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow_swapped:grow_16M_v0_65536
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow_swapped:grow_16M_v1_4096
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow_swapped:grow_16M_v2_8192
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_shrink:shrink_24M_16M_v0_32768
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_shrink:shrink_24M_16M_v1_65536
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_shrink_swapped:shrink_24M_16M_v0_4096
> >     sbin/resize_ffs/t_shrink_swapped:shrink_24M_16M_v1_8192
> 
> Hmm, I wonder I this is a rump issue.  In any case I'll take a look into the
> failures this evening.

Looks like the resize_ffs failures have been fixed already:

  http://www.gson.org/netbsd/bugs/build/i386-baremetal/commits-2019.12.html#2019.12.17.18.59.39

The lfs ones are still failing.
-- 
Andreas Gustafsson, gson%gson.org@localhost