On Thu 18 Oct 2018 at 08:12:21 +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > > ..../installation/misc.inst.xxxxxx > vs ..../installation/misc/inst.xxxxxx > ^ > ______________________| > Anyway, I'm not going to worry about it, as long as it's not a problem > due to my pgoyette-compat branch! Pure wild and unsubstantiated speculation: I recall a discussion recently about functions like basename(3) and whether they return a pointer to static storage, or modify their argument. Maybe this implementation detail did change recently and this is an unexpected side effect? -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- "What good is a Ring of Power \X/ rhialto/at/falu.nl -- if you're unable...to Speak." - Agent Elrond
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature