Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]


	hello.  We need the route-to  and reply-to functionality in pf(4)  in
order to support our service model.  I was told this hasn't been
implemented in npf(4).  Also, the instrumentation afforded by pfctl(8) with
regard to looking at state and rule tables seems to be pretty much
non-existent under npf(4).  We  could probably live without that, but it's
sure nice to have when debugging issues, especially when examining
protocols that punch dynamic holes through firewalls.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index