[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: oddness with libdrm shlib versions
> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 06:08:33 +1000
> from: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
> Martin Husemann writes:
> > [Updating from 5 to 6 and then 7 ends up with libdrm.so from 6]
> > The definitive answer should be in the set lists, see below for various
> > branches:
> > src-5/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.2.4
> > src-6-0/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2
> > src-6-1/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2
> > src-6/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.3
> > src-7-0/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2
> > src-7-1/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2
> > src-7/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2
> > src/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.4
> > So: yes, something looks wrong in -6. It comes from:
> > Update libdrm to 2.4.36.
> > Enable radeon KMS support in xf86-video-ati so that a netbsd-6
> > userland will work with a more recent (netbsd-7 and up) kernel.
> > [mrg, ticket #1326]
> > Matt, erroneous bump in that ticket, or some pullup missing for -7?
> > We may have to teach postinstall about it, but that would be a pain.
> i'm not sure. i guess missing pullup, but i'd have to check the
> whole thing to be sure.
It appears libdrm 2.4.36 was pulled up to netbsd-6 in ticket #1326,
but while the libdrm 2.4.59 sources in xsrc/external/mit/libdrm/dist
were pulled up to netbsd-7 in #463, no shlib_version bump in
src/external/mit/xorg/lib/libdrm made it to netbsd-7.
Main Index |
Thread Index |