Re: wm DAD duplicate address

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:44:31PM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:26:49PM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > > Netboot kernel with r1.241 also fails. (server is 1.242)
> > 
> > FWIW Netboot NetBSD 7 kernel works (server is 1.242)
> 
> Went back to the flex update of Mon Jan 2 16:26:30 2017 +0000 (b9dc6b54b)
> which also failed.

Maybe the result of the bisection isn't too surprising - get rid of DAD
completely and it can't complain.

# git bisect good
d7e49963faf52a2e69a033be25fa87ba5bbb976d is the first bad commit
commit d7e49963faf52a2e69a033be25fa87ba5bbb976d
Author: roy <roy>
Date:   Tue Oct 11 13:59:30 2016 +0000

    Implement RFC 5227 2.4 Ongoing Conflict Detection and Address Defence.
    
    If ip_dad_count is 0, then the conflict is just logged and the address
    is not marked as duplicated.

:040000 040000 8345b05ee8686ed797507b5ce0daa5d90e192905 9292dc9a35b2859474b8c08918deab2147678847 M      sys