Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: npf related panic



On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:37:32PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20170104185302.GB5015@quark>,
> Patrick Welche  <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:52:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >> On Jan 4,  3:45pm, prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost (Patrick Welche) wrote:
> >> -- Subject: Re: npf related panic
> >> 
> >> | npf seems blameless: see John Baker's message - we have the same stack trace
> >> | below pfil_run_addrhooks. (amd64 stack trace has pfil.c 1.30, the
> >RPI probably
> >> 
> >> Can you add a check printing:
> >> 
> >> 		printf("npf=%p ifa=%p\n", npf, ifa);
> >> 	        npf_ifaddr_sync(npf, ifa->ifa_ifp);
> >> 
> >> in src/sys/netinet/npf/npf_os.c in the address hook function?
> >
> >npf=0xfffffe81162fe7d0 ifa=0x0
> >
> >sure enough... null ifa...
> 
> Should be fixed...

Thanks! (RPI images good too...)

P


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index