Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd (Christos Zoulas) writes:

> In article <>,
> Greg Troxel  <> wrote:
>>I don't see any real problems, but I think there should have been public
>>discussion rather than announcing a decision.
> We can have it now... 

Well, it's not really the same when the decision has been made.

But how about posting the analysis of why the change?  Is it really
about MPL (and presumably the patent terms)?  Is it about security track
record?  Is unbound/nsd feature complete relative to everything that can
be done with bind?  Specifically, serving authoritative zones, DNSSEC,
dynamic updates, and (for others) split dns?

Please note that I'm not objecting; I'm just asking for the rationale to
be articulated.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index