christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) writes: > In article <rmi37m2njf9.fsf%fnord.ir.bbn.com@localhost>, > Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote: >> >>I don't see any real problems, but I think there should have been public >>discussion rather than announcing a decision. > > We can have it now... Well, it's not really the same when the decision has been made. But how about posting the analysis of why the change? Is it really about MPL (and presumably the patent terms)? Is it about security track record? Is unbound/nsd feature complete relative to everything that can be done with bind? Specifically, serving authoritative zones, DNSSEC, dynamic updates, and (for others) split dns? Please note that I'm not objecting; I'm just asking for the rationale to be articulated.
Description: PGP signature