Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

To: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Subject: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 11:49:37 +0200

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 04:29:54PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Alternatively, the man page could be changed to make EINVAL apply to
> invalid (for any reason) addresses, and all mention of ENOMEM removed,
> and the test updated (which would simplify it.)

The man page and Posix agree on this, so changing the documentation
is not the best fix here.

Martin

References:
- Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
  - From: NetBSD Test Fixture
- Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
Next by Date: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
Previous by Thread: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
Next by Thread: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index