On 2016-03-28 15:17, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2016-03-28 15:08, Johnny Billquist wrote:On 2016-03-28 10:54, Martin Husemann wrote:On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 01:42:23AM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:The error is: Configuring CCD devices. ccdconfig: ioctl (CCDIOCSET): /dev/ccd0c: Invalid argument /etc/rc.d/ccd exited with code 1 Did we do some incompatible change recently? Not too happy with this one.Nothing obvious, can you add printfs to the two EINVAL returns in the case CCDIOCSET: section?Yech! It's more complicated than that. After trying to just do that and getting nothing, I added: printf("ccd ioctl: %lu\n",cmd); as the first line of ccdioctl(), and the output is: Configuring CCD devices. ccd ioctl: 3223078416 ccdconfig: ioctl (CCDIOCSET): /dev/ccd0c: Invalid argument /etc/rc.d/ccd exited with code 1 ccd ioctl: 2149606504 So something broken in the syscall handling, the new compiler (this is on a VAX), or something else that I don't get yet... I should point out that apart from ccd, I've successfully booted that same kernel (another on another machine where I was not using ccd).And to make it clear: It never comes to the CCDIOCSET handling where it could return EINVAL. I have not really looked much deeper into the code.
Ok. Decided to dig a little deeper into this.
It's actually ccdinit() that fails. And the line where it fails is:
error = getdisksize(vpp[ix], &psize, &secsize);
Anyone know anything more about any newly introduced changes around the
struct vnode (which is what vpp is), or getdisksize()?
I now also realize that another error I was seeing at boot time, which I assumed was harmless, is probably also related:
Found ra0 at mscpbus0 drive 0: RA73
Found ra1 at mscpbus0 drive 1: RA73
Found ra2 at mscpbus0 drive 2: RA73
Found ra3 at mscpbus0 drive 3: RA73
Found ra4 at mscpbus1 drive 4: RA73
Found ra5 at mscpbus1 drive 5: RA73
Found ra6 at mscpbus1 drive 6: RA73
Found ra7 at mscpbus1 drive 7: RA73
ra0: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra0 (22)
ra1: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra1 (22)
ra2: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra2 (22)
ra3: no disk label: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra3 (22)
ra4: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra4 (22)
ra5: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra5 (22)
ra6: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra6 (22)
ra7: size 3920490 sectors
RAIDframe: can't get disk size for dev ra7 (22)
boot device: ra0
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol